🌏 閱讀中文版本
AWS Storage Solutions Complete Comparison: Amazon FSx vs S3 Deep Dive & Selection Guide
In the cloud computing era, choosing the right storage solution is critical to an enterprise’s data management strategy. Amazon Web Services (AWS) offers two distinctly different storage services: Amazon FSx (file system storage) and Amazon S3 (object storage). This article provides an in-depth analysis of the technical characteristics, use cases, cost structures, and performance profiles of both services to help you make optimal architectural decisions.
Core Differences: File System vs Object Storage
Fundamental Storage Model Differences
| Feature | Amazon FSx (File System) | Amazon S3 (Object Storage) |
|---|---|---|
| Storage Architecture | Hierarchical directory structure (folders/files) | Flat namespace (Bucket/Object) |
| Access Protocol | SMB, NFS, iSCSI, Lustre | REST API (HTTP/HTTPS) |
| Data Modification | Supports random read/write and real-time modification | Objects immutable (must replace entirely) |
| Consistency Model | Strong consistency (POSIX compliant) | Eventual consistency (read-after-write consistency) |
| Latency Performance | Sub-millisecond latency (< 1ms) | Millisecond-level latency (~10-100ms) |
| Throughput | Multiple GB/s to tens of GB/s | Unlimited scaling (depends on partition key design) |
| Cost Model | Provisioned capacity billing (fixed cost) | Actual usage billing (variable cost) |
| Minimum Billing Unit | Starting from 1.2 TB (type-dependent) | No minimum capacity limit |
| Durability | 99.9% – 99.99% (configuration-dependent) | 99.999999999% (11 nines) |
| Availability SLA | 99.9% (Single-AZ) / 99.99% (Multi-AZ) | 99.9% (S3 Standard) |
Data Access Pattern Differences
Amazon FSx:
- Supports file locking
- Multiple users can simultaneously read/write same file
- Supports file metadata (permissions, timestamps, ACLs)
- Suitable for applications requiring POSIX compatibility
Amazon S3:
- Each object is independent entity
- Access via HTTP/HTTPS
- Supports versioning
- Suitable for large amounts of unstructured data
Amazon FSx Deep Dive
FSx Service Family Overview
Amazon FSx offers four different file system types, each optimized for specific workloads:
1. FSx for Windows File Server
Use Cases:
- Enterprise applications in Windows environments (SharePoint, SQL Server, IIS)
- Requires Active Directory integration
- User home directories
- Content management systems
Technical Specifications:
Protocol: SMB 2.0/3.0/3.1.1
Capacity: 32 GB - 64 TB
Throughput: Up to 2 GB/s
IOPS: Hundreds of thousands of IOPS
Latency: Sub-millisecond
Support: DFS Namespaces, Shadow Copies, Data Deduplication
Pricing Example (us-east-1):
SSD Storage: $0.13/GB-month
HDD Storage: $0.013/GB-month
Throughput Capacity: $2.20/MBps-month
Backup: $0.05/GB-month
2. FSx for Lustre
Use Cases:
- High Performance Computing (HPC)
- Machine learning training (large volume of small file reads)
- Genomics analysis
- Media rendering and transcoding
- Financial simulation and risk analysis
Technical Specifications:
Protocol: Lustre (POSIX compliant)
Capacity: Starting from 1.2 TB (1.2 TB increments)
Throughput: Up to hundreds of GB/s
IOPS: Millions of IOPS
Latency: Sub-millisecond
Support: S3 integration (Lazy Loading / Data Repository Tasks)
S3 Integration Pattern:
# Create Lustre file system with S3 integration
aws fsx create-file-system
--file-system-type LUSTRE
--storage-capacity 1200
--subnet-ids subnet-12345678
--lustre-configuration
ImportPath=s3://my-bucket/data/,
ExportPath=s3://my-bucket/results/,
ImportedFileChunkSize=1024
Pricing Example (us-east-1):
SSD Storage (Persistent): $0.145/GB-month
HDD Storage (Persistent): $0.014/GB-month
Scratch Storage: $0.14/GB-month
Throughput Capacity: $0.13/MBps-month
3. FSx for NetApp ONTAP
Use Cases:
- Multi-protocol support required (NFS + SMB + iSCSI)
- Enterprise-grade data management features
- Capacity savings technologies (compression, deduplication, thin provisioning)
- Cross-cloud data replication
Technical Specifications:
Protocol: NFS v3/v4/v4.1, SMB 2.x/3.x, iSCSI
Capacity: 1 TB - 192 TB (per volume)
Throughput: Up to 4 GB/s
IOPS: Up to 160,000 IOPS
Support: SnapMirror, FlexClone, SnapLock
Capacity Savings Example:
# Enable compression and deduplication
volume efficiency modify -vserver svm1 -volume vol1
-compression true
-inline-compression true
-inline-dedupe true
-background-dedupe schedule
# View savings ratio
volume show -fields physical-used,logical-used,percent-snapshot-space
4. FSx for OpenZFS
Use Cases:
- Linux workload migration
- Containerized applications (EKS, ECS)
- Development/test environments (snapshot cloning)
- Data backup and archiving
Technical Specifications:
Protocol: NFS v3/v4/v4.1/v4.2
Capacity: 64 GB - 512 TB
Throughput: Up to 4 GB/s
IOPS: Up to 1,000,000 IOPS
Compression: LZ4 / ZSTD (up to 10:1 ratio)
Snapshots: Unlimited quantity, instant creation
FSx Performance Optimization Strategies
- Choose Correct Storage Type
SSD: Low-latency workloads (databases, dev environments) HDD: Large capacity, high throughput, cost-sensitive (backup, archiving) - Configure Adequate Throughput Capacity
# Monitor throughput utilization aws cloudwatch get-metric-statistics --namespace AWS/FSx --metric-name DataReadBytes --dimensions Name=FileSystemId,Value=fs-12345678 --start-time 2025-01-01T00:00:00Z --end-time 2025-01-02T00:00:00Z --period 3600 --statistics Average - Enable Multi-AZ Deployment
- Automatic failover (< 1 minute)
- Synchronous replication (RPO = 0)
- Increase availability to 99.99%
Amazon S3 Deep Dive
Complete S3 Storage Class Comparison
| Storage Class | Use Case | Availability | Minimum Storage Duration | Retrieval Fee |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S3 Standard | Frequently accessed data | 99.99% | None | None |
| S3 Intelligent-Tiering | Unknown access patterns | 99.9% | None | None (automatic tiering) |
| S3 Standard-IA | Infrequent access but fast retrieval needed | 99.9% | 30 days | $0.01/GB |
| S3 One Zone-IA | Reproducible data | 99.5% | 30 days | $0.01/GB |
| S3 Glacier Instant Retrieval | Quarterly access, millisecond retrieval | 99.9% | 90 days | $0.03/GB |
| S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval | Archiving, minute-to-hour retrieval | 99.99% | 90 days | $0.01-0.03/GB |
| S3 Glacier Deep Archive | Long-term archiving, 12-hour retrieval | 99.99% | 180 days | $0.02/GB |
S3 Pricing Example (us-east-1)
S3 Standard:
First 50 TB/month: $0.023/GB
Next 450 TB/month: $0.022/GB
Over 500 TB/month: $0.021/GB
PUT/COPY/POST: $0.005 per 1,000 requests
GET/SELECT: $0.0004 per 1,000 requests
Data Transfer:
Outbound to Internet: First 10 TB $0.09/GB
CloudFront transfer: Free
S3 Performance Optimization Techniques
1. Use Multipart Upload
import boto3
from boto3.s3.transfer import TransferConfig
s3_client = boto3.client('s3')
# Configure multipart upload (files over 100MB)
config = TransferConfig(
multipart_threshold=1024 * 25, # 25 MB
max_concurrency=10,
multipart_chunksize=1024 * 25,
use_threads=True
)
# Upload large file
s3_client.upload_file(
'large_file.zip',
'my-bucket',
'uploads/large_file.zip',
Config=config
)
2. Implement Partition Key Strategy
❌ Poor Design (same prefix):
my-bucket/logs/2025-01-01-log1.txt
my-bucket/logs/2025-01-01-log2.txt
my-bucket/logs/2025-01-01-log3.txt
✅ Good Design (hash prefix):
my-bucket/a3f/logs/2025-01-01-log1.txt
my-bucket/b7/logs/2025-01-01-log2.txt
my-bucket/e9c/logs/2025-01-01-log3.txt
3. Enable S3 Transfer Acceleration
# Enable transfer acceleration
aws s3api put-bucket-accelerate-configuration
--bucket my-bucket
--accelerate-configuration Status=Enabled
# Use acceleration endpoint
aws s3 cp large_file.zip s3://my-bucket/
--endpoint-url https://my-bucket.s3-accelerate.amazonaws.com
4. Configure Lifecycle Policies
{
"Rules": [
{
"Id": "ArchiveOldData",
"Status": "Enabled",
"Transitions": [
{
"Days": 30,
"StorageClass": "STANDARD_IA"
},
{
"Days": 90,
"StorageClass": "GLACIER_IR"
},
{
"Days": 365,
"StorageClass": "DEEP_ARCHIVE"
}
],
"NoncurrentVersionExpiration": {
"NoncurrentDays": 90
}
}
]
}
Cost Analysis & Calculation Examples
Scenario 1: High-Performance File Storage (10 TB, Frequent Access)
FSx for Windows File Server (SSD):
Storage cost: 10,240 GB × $0.13 = $1,331.20/month
Throughput (256 MBps): 256 × $2.20 = $563.20/month
Backup (daily, 7-day retention): 10,240 GB × $0.05 = $512/month
Total: ~$2,406/month
S3 Standard (not suitable for this scenario):
Storage cost: 10,240 GB × $0.023 = $235.52/month
GET requests (1M/day): 30M × $0.0004 / 1000 = $12/month
Total: ~$248/month
⚠️ But high latency, no real-time file modification, requires app refactoring
Scenario 2: Backup Archive (100 TB, 1% Monthly Access)
FSx for Lustre (HDD):
Storage cost: 102,400 GB × $0.014 = $1,433.60/month
Total: ~$1,434/month
S3 Intelligent-Tiering:
Storage cost (Frequent Access Tier): 1,024 GB × $0.023 = $23.55/month
Storage cost (Infrequent Access Tier): 101,376 GB × $0.0125 = $1,267.20/month
Monitoring fee: 102,400 × $0.0025 / 1000 = $0.26/month
Total: ~$1,291/month
✅ Cost savings: ~$143/month (10%)
Scenario 3: Data Lake (1 PB, Low-Frequency Access)
S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval:
Storage cost: 1,048,576 GB × $0.0036 = $3,775/month
PUT requests (initial upload): One-time cost
Retrieval fee (1% monthly): 10,486 GB × $0.03 = $315/month
Total: ~$4,090/month
✅ vs FSx savings: ~90% cost reduction
Decision Framework
When to Use FSx
| Requirement | Recommended FSx Type |
|---|---|
| Windows enterprise applications | FSx for Windows File Server |
| HPC / Machine Learning | FSx for Lustre |
| Multi-protocol support | FSx for NetApp ONTAP |
| Linux NFS workloads | FSx for OpenZFS |
| File locking required | Any FSx type |
| POSIX permissions | Lustre / ONTAP / OpenZFS |
| Low latency (< 1ms) | Any FSx type (SSD) |
When to Use S3
- ✅ Store large amounts of unstructured data (video, images, logs)
- ✅ Need unlimited scalability
- ✅ Data doesn’t require frequent modification
- ✅ Can tolerate millisecond-level latency
- ✅ Need integration with Lambda, Athena, EMR
- ✅ Static website hosting
- ✅ Data lake / Big data analytics
- ✅ Long-term archiving (Glacier)
Hybrid Architecture Example
Typical HPC Workflow:
1. Raw data stored in S3 Standard (100 TB)
2. FSx for Lustre mounts S3 Bucket (Lazy Loading)
3. EC2 compute nodes read data via Lustre at high speed
4. Computation results written to Lustre (Export to S3)
5. Final results synced to S3 for long-term storage
Cost Optimization:
- S3 storage: $2,300/month
- FSx Scratch (temporary): $1,400/month (during compute)
- Total: ~$3,700/month
vs. All FSx Persistent: ~$14,800/month
Savings: ~75%
Migration Strategies
Migrating from On-Premises NAS to FSx
- Use AWS DataSync
# Create DataSync Task aws datasync create-task --source-location-arn arn:aws:datasync:us-east-1:123456789:location/loc-abc123 --destination-location-arn arn:aws:datasync:us-east-1:123456789:location/loc-fsx456 --cloud-watch-log-group-arn arn:aws:logs:us-east-1:123456789:log-group:/aws/datasync --name "NAS-to-FSx-Migration" # Execute migration aws datasync start-task-execution --task-arn arn:aws:datasync:us-east-1:123456789:task/task-xyz789 - Verify Data Integrity
# DataSync auto-performs checksum verification aws datasync describe-task-execution --task-execution-arn arn:aws:datasync:... - Switch Applications
# Update DNS records or mount points sudo mount -t nfs -o nfsvers=4.1 fs-12345678.fsx.us-east-1.amazonaws.com:/ /mnt/fsx
Migrating from S3 to FSx for Lustre
# Create Lustre file system with S3 integration
aws fsx create-file-system
--file-system-type LUSTRE
--storage-capacity 1200
--lustre-configuration
ImportPath=s3://my-data-bucket/,
AutoImportPolicy=NEW_CHANGED
# Data auto-loads on first access (Lazy Loading)
Best Practices
Security Configuration
- FSx Security Group Settings
# Allow only specific VPC CIDR access aws ec2 authorize-security-group-ingress --group-id sg-fsx123 --protocol tcp --port 445 --cidr 10.0.0.0/16 - S3 Bucket Policy
{ "Version": "2012-10-17", "Statement": [ { "Effect": "Deny", "Principal": "*", "Action": "s3:*", "Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::my-bucket/*", "Condition": { "Bool": { "aws:SecureTransport": "false" } } } ] } - Enable Encryption
# FSx encryption at rest (KMS) --kms-key-id arn:aws:kms:us-east-1:123456789:key/abc-123 # S3 default encryption aws s3api put-bucket-encryption --bucket my-bucket --server-side-encryption-configuration '{ "Rules": [{ "ApplyServerSideEncryptionByDefault": { "SSEAlgorithm": "aws:kms", "KMSMasterKeyID": "arn:aws:kms:us-east-1:123456789:key/abc-123" } }] }'
Monitoring & Alerting
# FSx key metrics
aws cloudwatch put-metric-alarm
--alarm-name fsx-storage-capacity
--metric-name StorageCapacity
--namespace AWS/FSx
--statistic Average
--period 300
--threshold 85
--comparison-operator GreaterThanThreshold
# S3 request metrics
aws cloudwatch put-metric-alarm
--alarm-name s3-4xx-errors
--metric-name 4xxErrors
--namespace AWS/S3
--statistic Sum
--period 300
--threshold 100
--comparison-operator GreaterThanThreshold
Common Troubleshooting
Issue 1: FSx Performance Below Expectations
Diagnostic Steps:
- Check throughput capacity configuration
aws fsx describe-file-systems --file-system-ids fs-12345678 | jq '.FileSystems[0].WindowsConfiguration.ThroughputCapacity' - Confirm network configuration (ensure EC2 in same AZ)
- Check CloudWatch metrics: DataReadBytes, DataWriteBytes, MetadataOperations
Issue 2: Slow S3 Upload Speed
Solutions:
- Use multipart upload (see example above)
- Enable S3 Transfer Acceleration
- Increase concurrent connections
- Use AWS Direct Connect for improved network speed
Issue 3: S3 Costs Exceeding Budget
Cost Analysis Tools:
# Use S3 Storage Lens for analysis
aws s3control get-storage-lens-configuration
--account-id 123456789
--config-id default-account-dashboard
# Check request type distribution
aws s3api get-bucket-metrics-configuration
--bucket my-bucket
--id EntireBucket
Conclusion & Recommendations
Amazon FSx and S3 each have unique advantages and are not mutually exclusive, but rather complementary storage solutions:
- ✅ Choose FSx: When you need traditional file system features, low latency, POSIX compatibility, file locking
- ✅ Choose S3: When you need unlimited scalability, extreme durability, cost optimization, deep AWS service integration
- ✅ Hybrid Architecture: Combine both strengths (e.g., FSx for Lustre + S3) to achieve optimal balance between performance and cost
Decision Recommendations:
- Evaluate workload I/O patterns (random vs sequential)
- Determine latency requirements (sub-millisecond vs millisecond)
- Calculate actual costs (including request fees, data transfer)
- Consider future scalability needs
- Execute POC to test actual performance
By deeply understanding the technical characteristics and cost structures of both services, you can build the most suitable cloud storage architecture for your enterprise, achieving optimal balance between performance, cost, and reliability.